From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
NO. 2:90-cv-520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 2:90-cv-520 LKK JFM P

03-26-2013

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Defendants have recently filed ECF Nos. 4326, 4487 and 4509, all of which rely in part upon a document which they have withdrawn from the record (ECF No. 4314). The Court presumes that the references to the withdrawn document are simply errors. However, in order to avoid reintroducing ECF No. 4314 back into the record, to avoid confusion, and good cause appearing:

Defendants, in response to an Order To Show Cause (ECF No. 4335), asked the Clerk to remove ECF No. 4314 (along with ECF No. 4312) from the record (ECF No. 4348). The Clerk marked the document REMOVED and placed it under seal. However, the document was not physically removed. As a result of defendants' withdrawal of the document, ECF No. 4314 is to have no further role in this litigation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall, on or before 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 28, 2013, file corrected versions of ECF Nos. 4326, 4487 and 4509, omitting all citations to ECF No. 4314.

______________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
NO. 2:90-cv-520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Coleman v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

NO. 2:90-cv-520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)