From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Brown

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 18, 2013
2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion


RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants. No. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 18, 2013

          ORDER

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

         On March 14, 2013, the parties filed a Joint Statement Regarding Discovery Dispute. (ECF No. 4382.) The dispute centers on the timing of the deposition of plaintiffs' expert Dr. Craig Haney.

         After review of the papers and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Defendants' motion to compel the deposition of Dr. Haney on or before March 19, 2013, or to exclude his testimony, is denied.

         2. Plaintiffs shall offer Dr. Haney for deposition at his earliest available time and in any event not later than March 22, 2013.

         3. Defendants may file a supplemental reply brief based on said deposition on or before 1:30 p.m. on March 26, 2013.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Brown

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 18, 2013
2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Coleman v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)