From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2013
NO. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P NO. C01-1351 TEH

03-11-2013

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants. MARCIANO PLATA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COMPOSED OF THREE JUDGES

PURSUANT TO SECTION 2284, TITLE 28 UNITED STATES CODE


THREE-JUDGE COURT


ORDER REQUIRING

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS'

REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

On March 11, 2013, plaintiffs filed a request for leave to file a supplemental brief in opposition to defendants' motion to vacate or modify the population reduction order and in support of plaintiffs' motion for further relief. Good cause appearing, defendants shall file any opposition to plaintiffs' request to file a supplemental brief not later than five (5) days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

STEPEEN REINHARDT

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

____________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

_________________________

THELTON E. HENDERSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


Summaries of

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2013
NO. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Coleman v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

NO. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)