From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
NO. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P NO. C01-1351 TEH

05-03-2013

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al., Defendants. MARCIANO PLATA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al., Defendants.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COMPOSED OF THREE JUDGES


PURSUANT TO SECTION 2284, TITLE 28 UNITED STATES CODE


THREE-JUDGE COURT


ORDER REQUIRING

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS'

MAY 2, 2013 FILING

On May 2, 2013, defendants submitted a response to this Court's April 11, 2013 Order Requiring List of Proposed Population Reduction Measures, including a Plan for how they will reduce the prison population to 137.5% design capacity by December, 31 2013. Plaintiffs shall file a response to defendants' filing on or before May 20, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

STEPHEN REINHARDT

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE

NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

_____________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

_____________

THELTON E. HENDERSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


Summaries of

Coleman v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
NO. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Coleman v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 3, 2013

Citations

NO. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)