From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Baughman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2022
2:16-cv-0652 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:16-cv-0652 MCE AC P

09-20-2022

SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 12, 2022, petitioner filed a motion for relief from judgment and request for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 31. Several documents, including what appears to be part of the original petition filed in March 2016, are attached. Id. at 5-53.

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed on March 21, 2018. ECF Nos. 24, 25. Thereafter, petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability was denied by the Ninth Circuit for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 30. For these reasons, the documents filed by petitioner will be disregarded. No orders will issue in response to future filings. DATED: September 20, 2022 '


Summaries of

Coleman v. Baughman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2022
2:16-cv-0652 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Coleman v. Baughman

Case Details

Full title:SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2022

Citations

2:16-cv-0652 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2022)