From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Guillen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2095 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-2095 KJN P

10-20-2015

ODDIS VERMONT COLE, Plaintiff, v. F. GUILLEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned (ECF No. 1 at 4) for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Plaintiff's four page complaint was signed on July 15, 2015, and filed in the Northern District of California on July 27, 2015. The court's own records reveal that on June 17, 2015, plaintiff signed a four page complaint, filed in the Northern District on June 29, 2015, containing virtually identical allegations. (Case No. 2:15-cv-1613 GEB DAD). Both cases were subsequently transferred to the Eastern District. Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court will dismiss the complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Dated: October 20, 2015

A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980). --------

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/cole2095.23


Summaries of

Cole v. Guillen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 20, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2095 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Cole v. Guillen

Case Details

Full title:ODDIS VERMONT COLE, Plaintiff, v. F. GUILLEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 20, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-2095 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2015)