Opinion
CIV-20-655-G
02-10-2022
STEVEN L. COLE, for himself and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT CROW, Director, O.D.O.C., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
CHARLES B. GOODWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court for review of the Supplemental Report and Recommendation (“Suppl. R. & R.”) (Doc. No. 64) issued on January 4, 2022, by United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). In the Supplemental R. & R., Judge Purcell recommends that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 62) filed by Defendants Scott Crow, Tonia Dickerson, Lonnie Lawson, and Donna McCaslin be granted and that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60) filed by Plaintiff Steven L. Cole be denied. See R. & R. at 5-7.
In the Supplemental R. & R., Judge Purcell advised the parties of their right to object to the Supplemental R. & R. by January 24, 2022. Judge Purcell also advised that a failure to timely object would constitute a waiver of the right to appellate review of the factual findings and legal conclusions contained in the Supplemental R. & R.
As of this date, no party has objected to the Supplemental R. & R. or sought an extension of time to do so.
Accordingly, the Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 64) is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 62) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60) is DENIED. A separate judgment shall be entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.