From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Cole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 18, 2012
NO. 3-12-0153 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-12-0153

05-18-2012

TODD G. COLE v. PAMELA COLE, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are the following Motions: Defendant Hirschberg's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8); Defendant Roselli's First Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 14); Defendant Digulian's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 22); Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct (Docket No. 37) and Plaintiff's Motion for In Camera Interview with Minor Child (Docket No. 44).

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 8, 14 and 22) are GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct (Docket No. 37) is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion for In Camera Interview with Minor Child (Docket No. 44) is DENIED as moot.

Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cole v. Cole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 18, 2012
NO. 3-12-0153 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Cole v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:TODD G. COLE v. PAMELA COLE, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-12-0153 (M.D. Tenn. May. 18, 2012)