From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coil v. Peterkin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 12, 2010
401 F. App'x 773 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-8008.

Submitted: October 6, 2010.

Decided: November 12, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-00145-WO-WWD).

Samuel L. Coil, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Samuel L. Coil appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coil v. Peterkin, No. 1:07-cv-00145-WOWWD, 2009 WL 3247848 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2009). We deny Coil's motions for appointment of counsel and for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Coil v. Peterkin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 12, 2010
401 F. App'x 773 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Coil v. Peterkin

Case Details

Full title:Samuel L. COIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hubert PETERKIN, Hoke County…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 12, 2010

Citations

401 F. App'x 773 (4th Cir. 2010)