From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohn v. City of Clearlake

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 30, 2024
23-cv-05882-TLT (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05882-TLT

04-30-2024

GEORGE R. COHN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CLEARLAKE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

TRINA L. THOMPSON, United States District Judge.

Self-represented Plaintiff, George R. Cohn, commenced the action on November 14, 2023. Compl., ECF 1. Defendants City of Clearlake, the Police Department of Clearlake, County of Lake, and the U.S. Marshalls service, however, have yet to be served with summons.

A court may dismiss an action without prejudice on its own, with notice to the plaintiff, if defendant has not been served within 90 days of the complaint's filing. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The date marking 90 days since filing of the pending complaint was February 12, 2024.

On February 15, 2024, we ordered plaintiff to submit proof of service by March 31, 2024. ECF 15. Approximately one month after the Court's ordered deadline, no proof of service has been filed.

The Court hereby DISMISSES the cases without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cohn v. City of Clearlake

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 30, 2024
23-cv-05882-TLT (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Cohn v. City of Clearlake

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE R. COHN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CLEARLAKE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 30, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05882-TLT (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2024)