Opinion
Argued January 15, 1894
Decided January 23, 1894
Charles H. Mills for appellant.
Mark Cohn for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Cohn v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1894
36 N.E. 344 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Cohn v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1894
36 N.E. 344 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Cohn v. Baldwin
Case Details
Full title:JACOB COHN, Respondent, v . CHARLES A. BALDWIN, Defendant; FRANK E…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 23, 1894
Citations
36 N.E. 344 (N.Y. 1894)
36 N.E. 344
60 N.Y. St. Rptr. 337
Citing Cases
Webster v. Fitchburg R.R. Co.
No reason is given why the affidavit is made by the attorney for the defendant. It has been repeatedly held…
Sullivan v. WatermanIn Isaac v. Wilisch, 69 Hun. 339, it was held that a plaintiff should not be compelled to furnish a bill of…