From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. American Surety Co. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1908
129 App. Div. 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

December 11, 1908.

Michel Kirtland, for the appellant.

Charles M. Demond of counsel [ Henry C. Willcox, attorney] for the respondent.


For the reasons stated in the opinion handed down herewith on the appeal from the order directing that the issues raised by the equitable counterclaim and the reply thereto be first tried at Special Term ( Cohen v. American Surety Co., No. 1, 129 App. Div. 166), the order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

PATTERSON, P.J., and LAUGHLIN, J., concurred; INGRAHAM and SCOTT, JJ., dissented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.


Summaries of

Cohen v. American Surety Co. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1908
129 App. Div. 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Cohen v. American Surety Co. No. 2

Case Details

Full title:J. QUINTUS COHEN, as Trustee of Estate of JOHN T. LEE, Bankrupt…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1908

Citations

129 App. Div. 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
113 N.Y.S. 383

Citing Cases

Cohen v. American Surety Co. No. 1

I can see no escape from the conclusion, therefore, that this equitable counterclaim must be disposed of by a…