From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coffey v. Brodsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 9, 2000.

December 6, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to real property, the defendant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated December 3, 1999, which granted the plaintiff's motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant.

McCormick Turpin, Pearl River, N.Y. (Edward J. Barbour of counsel), for appellants.

Dorfman, Lynch Knoebel, Nyack, N.Y. (Rory Kiernan P. Clark of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties is not aggrieved by the order which granted the plaintiff's motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant under the relation-back doctrine (see, Poulard v. Papamihlopoulos, 254 A.D.2d 266). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.


Summaries of

Coffey v. Brodsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Coffey v. Brodsky

Case Details

Full title:GENEVIEVE COFFEY, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM BRODSKY, ETC., APPELLANT, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 191 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

Yanovsky v. 833 Flatbush

Before: Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal from so much of the…

LDV Enterprises, Inc. v. Puma

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ. ORDERED that…