From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cody v. Jeffreys

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 5, 2013
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-974 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 5, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-CV-974

06-05-2013

JAMES CODY, Petitioner, v. ROB JEFFREYS, WARDEN, Respondent.


JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL R. MERZ


OPINION AND ORDER

On April 23, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Supplemental Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's supplemental recommendations, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation and Supplemental Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

The Court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in objective good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cody v. Jeffreys

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 5, 2013
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-974 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Cody v. Jeffreys

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CODY, Petitioner, v. ROB JEFFREYS, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 5, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-CV-974 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 5, 2013)