From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cody v. Jeffreys

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 2:10-cv-974 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-974

03-07-2013

JAMES CODY, Petitioner, v. ROB JEFFREYS, Warden, Respondent.


District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 13) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 11).

The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after farther analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Response and making recommendations based on that analysis.

_______________________

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cody v. Jeffreys

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 2:10-cv-974 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Cody v. Jeffreys

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CODY, Petitioner, v. ROB JEFFREYS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-974 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 7, 2013)