From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cockerham v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Dec 9, 2021
No. 01-21-00527-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

01-21-00527-CR

12-09-2021

Joe Roy Cockerham v. The State of Texas


Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County Trial court case No: 1549525

ORDER

Richard Hightower, Judge

Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief but this request is premature because the complete record has not yet been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Although the reporter's record was filed on November 9, 2021, the clerk's record has not yet been filed. Appellant's brief is not due until 30 days after the clerk's record is filed. See id.

Accordingly, we deny appellant's motion as premature.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cockerham v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Dec 9, 2021
No. 01-21-00527-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Cockerham v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joe Roy Cockerham v. The State of Texas

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

No. 01-21-00527-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 9, 2021)