From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobb v. Cook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1666 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1666 JAM AC P

05-07-2013

PABLO COBB, Plaintiff, v. COOK, et al. Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed February 27, 2013, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Cook. ECF No. 19. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice against defendant Cook. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

__________________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AC:rb/cobb1666.fusm


Summaries of

Cobb v. Cook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-1666 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Cobb v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:PABLO COBB, Plaintiff, v. COOK, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 7, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1666 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)