From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobb v. Bodison

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division
Feb 14, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:10-00919-HFF-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:10-00919-HFF-BHH.

February 14, 2011


ORDER


This case was filed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. Petitioner is proceeding pro se. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that Respondent's motion for summary judgment be granted and that the habeas petition be dismissed with prejudice. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on January 20, 2011, and the Clerk of Court entered Petitioner's objections to the Report on February 9, 2011. After a thorough review of Petitioner's objections, the Court finds them to be without merit and agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the petition should be dismissed because it is time barred under the one-year limitations period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court overrules Petitioner's objections, adopts the Report to the extent it is consistent with this Order, and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that Respondent's motion for summary judgment be GRANTED and that the habeas petition be DISMISSED with prejudice.

To the extent that Petitioner requests a certificate of appealability from this Court, that certificate is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 14th day of February, 2011, in Spartanburg, South Carolina.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within 30 days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Cobb v. Bodison

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division
Feb 14, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:10-00919-HFF-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Cobb v. Bodison

Case Details

Full title:ANQUAN M. COBB, Petitioner, v. WARDEN McKITHER BODISON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division

Date published: Feb 14, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:10-00919-HFF-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2011)