From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clower v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
Jan 15, 2014
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12-03483 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 15, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12-03483

01-15-2014

CLIFTON LANE CLOWER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge VanDervort submitted his Proposed Findings and Recommendation ("PF&R") to the court on December 16, 2013, in which he recommended that the district court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, deny plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, grant defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and dismiss this matter from the court's docket.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort's PF&R. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989).

The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's PF&R within the seventeen-day period. Having reviewed the PF&R filed by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the court adopts the findings and recommendation contained therein.

Accordingly, the court adopts the factual and legal analysis contained within the PF&R, DENIES plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 11), GRANTS defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 15), AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this matter from the court's docket.

The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to all counsel of record.

It is SO ORDERED this 15th day of January, 2014.

ENTER:

__________

David A. Faber

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Clower v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD
Jan 15, 2014
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12-03483 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Clower v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON LANE CLOWER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD

Date published: Jan 15, 2014

Citations

CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12-03483 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Berryhill

Furthermore, the ALJ was not required to accept the VE's testimony in response to the more restrictive…

Grandstaff v. Saul

However, an ALJ is not required to adopt a VE's response to a hypothetical, including any off-task limitation…