From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cloverdale Garden Apts. v. Martin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 28, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 175 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)

Opinion

March 28, 1962

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, CHARLES J. VALLONE, J.

Dorsey Berko ( Louis J. Berko of counsel), for appellant.

Brennan Landers for respondent.


The presence of the washing machine in tenant's apartment, connected to the plumbing and requiring but the turn of a dial to put it in operation, constituted continued "installation and use" of the machine in contravention of lease provision 23. ( Emanden Realty Corp. v. Angley, 24 Misc.2d 877 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; cf. L.H. Estates Co. v. Bartholomew, 9 Misc.2d 116 [App. Term, 1st Dept.], affd. 5 A.D.2d 815.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed, with $30 costs to landlord, and final order directed for landlord with appropriate costs in the court below. If tenant disconnects and removes the washing machine from his apartment within 5 days after the service of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, the eviction is stayed until further order of the court.

Concur — HART, BROWN and BENJAMIN, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Cloverdale Garden Apts. v. Martin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 28, 1962
35 Misc. 2d 175 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
Case details for

Cloverdale Garden Apts. v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:CLOVERDALE GARDEN APARTMENTS, INC., Appellant, v. STEVEN MARTIN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1962

Citations

35 Misc. 2d 175 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
232 N.Y.S.2d 57

Citing Cases

Fanchild Investors v. Cohen

In L.H. Estates Co. v. Bartholomew ( 9 Misc.2d 116, affd. 5 A.D.2d 815) the court held that the agreement of…