From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clove v. Town of Woodbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 2002
292 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-02834

Argued February 11, 2002.

March 18, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain provisions of the Town Code of the Town of Woodbury requiring the payment of parkland fees as a condition of approval of a subdivision are unconstitutional, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated December 20, 2000, as granted that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment declaring that the provisions requiring the payment of the parkland fees are unconstitutional only to the extent of remitting the issue of the propriety of the parkland fees imposed on its subdivision to the Town of Woodbury Planning Board for further proceedings in accordance with Town Law § 277. By order dated March 27, 2001, the appeal, which was purportedly taken as of right to the Court of Appeals (see, CPLR 5601[b][2]), was transferred to this court (see, N.Y. Const, art VI, § 5[b]; Long Clove v. Town of Woodbury, 96 N.Y.2d 775).

James G. Sweeney, Goshen, N.Y., for appellant.

Egan, Wienberg Associates, Monroe, N.Y. (Christine K. Wienberg of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly remitted the issue of the propriety of the parkland fees, imposed on the plaintiff's subdivision as a condition of approval of the subdivision, to the Town of Woodbury Planning Board for further proceedings (see, Matter of Bayswater Realty Capital Corp. v. Planning Bd. of Town of Lewisboro, 76 N.Y.2d 460, 470-471; Matter of Sepco Ventures v. Planning Bd. of Town of Woodbury, 230 A.D.2d 913, 914; Town Law § 277).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contentions.

S. MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, CRANE and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clove v. Town of Woodbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 2002
292 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Clove v. Town of Woodbury

Case Details

Full title:LONG CLOVE, LLC, appellant, v. TOWN OF WOODBURY, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

Legacy at Fairways v. McAdoo

We further conclude, however, that the appropriate remedy for the imposition of a recreation fee in the…

In re Dobbs Ferry Development Associates

Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly declared the fee to be invalid. However, the Supreme Court should…