From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cloud v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 27, 2013
122 So. 3d 1006 (La. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2013–C–1304.

2013-09-27

Julia CLOUD v. Jo Ann Boggs BARNES, Michael Delesdernier, Attorney at Law and ABC Insurance Company.


IN RE: Could, Julia et al; Swift, Rickey K.; –Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 1, No. 547750; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 47, 764–CA.

Denied. HUGHES, J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant the writ and assigns reasons.

The defendants effected a de facto suspensive appeal by intentionally disobeying the trial court's order to cancel the lis pendens. While plaintiff may not have responded in the best manner (a rule for contempt would have been more appropriate), I can understand the frustration. Given the factual background of this litigation, I do not believe sanctions were appropriate. Accordingly, I would grant the writ.


Summaries of

Cloud v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 27, 2013
122 So. 3d 1006 (La. 2013)
Case details for

Cloud v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:Julia CLOUD v. Jo Ann Boggs BARNES, Michael Delesdernier, Attorney at Law…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

122 So. 3d 1006 (La. 2013)

Citing Cases

Molinere v. Lapeyrouse

Four factors have evolved that must be considered in arriving at an appropriate sanction award, including: 1)…

Marks v. Marks

Having determined that sanctions are appropriate, we next evaluate whether the trial court abused its…