Opinion
No. 73110
05-25-2017
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition requesting various relief related to district court proceedings concerning a petition for judicial review of a matter arising from the foreclosure mediation program.
Having considered the documents before this court, we conclude that petitioner has not met the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary writ relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (providing that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851(1991) (explaining that it is within this court's sole discretion to determine if a writ petition will be considered); NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we deny the petition.
In light of our denial of the petition, we deny the motion for a stay of the district court proceedings as moot. --------
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Silver
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Kathleen Delaney, District Judge
Kelli Y. Clingman
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk