From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cling Corp. v. Ridgewood Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1987
133 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

October 13, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint is denied.

The defendant bank had a right to stop payment on the teller's check payable to the order of the plaintiff (see, UCC 4-403; 4-104 [1] [e]), but the stop payment order does not automatically preclude recovery on the check (see, Bank of N Y v. Welz, 118 Misc.2d 645, 648). However, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint should not have been granted because there are triable issues of fact which are exclusively within the knowledge of the plaintiff, and the defendant should be given an opportunity to conduct discovery (see, Crocker-Citizens Natl. Bank v. L.N. Mag. Distribs., 26 A.D.2d 667). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cling Corp. v. Ridgewood Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1987
133 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Cling Corp. v. Ridgewood Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:CLING CORP., Respondent, v. RIDGEWOOD SAVINGS BANK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Univ. Sav. v. Intercont. Consol

However, the court found plaintiff to be a holder in due course and that no defenses were available against a…

Eisenberg v. HSBC Payment Service Inc.

The instrument does not qualify if outside proof is needed, other than simple proof of nonpayment or a…