From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cline v. Harmon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2013
521 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6011

05-28-2013

PHILLIP CLINE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. J. HARMON, Acting Warden; MIKE SNOW, Unit Manager; MR. THOMPSON; DR. DOMINICK MCLAIN, D.O.; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, All in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Phillip Cline, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00870) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip Cline, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Phillip Cline appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cline's complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cline v. Harmon, No. 5:11-cv-00870 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Cline v. Harmon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2013
521 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Cline v. Harmon

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP CLINE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. D. J. HARMON, Acting Warden; MIKE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 28, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2013)