From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clifton v. Beto

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 7, 1969
411 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 26851.

May 7, 1969.

Sam R. Wilson, Houston, Tex., for appellant.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Allo B. Crow, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Hawthorne Phillips, Staff Legal Asst., Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before COLEMAN and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges, and SKELTON, Judge of the Court of Claims.

Sitting by designation as a member of this panel.


The District Court, 298 F. Supp. 1384, denied habeas corpus relief to this state prisoner and he appeals. We affirm.

We must agree with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that Clifton is not entitled to credit for time spent on parole prior to the revocation of his conditional pardon, Ex parte Clifton, 415 S.W.2d 661 (1967).

The facts in Clifton's case are materially different to those in Shields v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1967, 370 F.2d 1003. Texas did not surrender him to another jurisdiction and thereafter "lose interest in him". To the contrary, the appellant violated his Texas parole and subsequently was convicted of and imprisoned for offenses committed in other jurisdictions. Thus he, not Texas, was the efficient, moving cause of the delay now sought to be invoked.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Clifton v. Beto

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 7, 1969
411 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Clifton v. Beto

Case Details

Full title:Claude C. CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 7, 1969

Citations

411 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Moore v. State of Missouri

Further, from the circumstances alleged by petitioner there is no indication that the State of Missouri…

Hawkins v. Freeman

See Shields, 370 F.2d at 1003-04. See Camper v. Norris, 36 F.3d 782 (8th Cir. 1994); Martinez, 837 F.2d 861;…