From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. Martinez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 16, 2023
23-cv-00093-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-00093-VC

05-16-2023

IVAN VERNARD CLEVELAND, Petitioner, v. L. MARTINEZ, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RE: DKT. NOS. 2, 3

VINCE CHHABRIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case was opened when Ivan Vernard Cleveland filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and was allowed twenty-eight days to pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice. Twenty-eight days have passed, and Cleveland has not filed an IFP application, or otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cleveland v. Martinez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 16, 2023
23-cv-00093-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Cleveland v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:IVAN VERNARD CLEVELAND, Petitioner, v. L. MARTINEZ, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 16, 2023

Citations

23-cv-00093-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 16, 2023)