From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. Bridges

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 9, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv104 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 9, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv104

06-09-2015

CHAD W. CLEVELAND v. JASON BRIDGES, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Chad W. Cleveland, an inmate at the John Lightfoot Law Enforcement Center, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends this action be dismissed for want of prosecution.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendations.

SIGNED this 9th day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cleveland v. Bridges

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 9, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv104 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Cleveland v. Bridges

Case Details

Full title:CHAD W. CLEVELAND v. JASON BRIDGES, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 9, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv104 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 9, 2015)