From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cleveland v. Boulos Enters.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 16, 2022
CV 22-447-JFW(MARx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-447-JFW(MARx)

03-16-2022

Eric Cleveland v. Boulos Enterprises, LLC, et al.


PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

As a result of the parties' failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's Order of January 31, 2002, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference, currently on calendar for March 28, 2002, is VACATED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-88 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cleveland v. Boulos Enters.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 16, 2022
CV 22-447-JFW(MARx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Cleveland v. Boulos Enters.

Case Details

Full title:Eric Cleveland v. Boulos Enterprises, LLC, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

CV 22-447-JFW(MARx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)