Opinion
21-1344
11-29-2021
ROMAN CLEMENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SPARTANBURG STEEL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Roman Lavar Clement, Appellant Pro Se. Wade Edward Ballard, Brian Novak McCracken, FORD &HARRISON LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: November 23, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00666-MGL)
Roman Lavar Clement, Appellant Pro Se.
Wade Edward Ballard, Brian Novak McCracken, FORD &HARRISON LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roman Clement appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Defendant's motion to dismiss Clement's complaint alleging that he was discriminated against because of his race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court's amended judgment. See Clement v. Spartanburg Steel Prods., Inc., No. 7:19-cv-00666-MGL (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The district court also dismissed Clement's claim that Defendant violated the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). But because Clement does not challenge the propriety of this ruling on appeal, we do not consider it. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
AFFIRMED