From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayton v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
May 5, 1933
131 Cal.App. 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 9107.

May 5, 1933.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and James G. Conlan, Judge thereof, from dissolving an attachment. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

J.E. White and Abraham Setzer for Petitioner.


THE COURT.

The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.

[1] The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner's attachment ( Truck Owners Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [ 228 P. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. Superior Court, 8 Cal.App. 622 [ 97 P. 681]; People v. San Diego, 71 Cal.App. 421 [ 236 P. 377]).


Summaries of

Clayton v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
May 5, 1933
131 Cal.App. 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Clayton v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:PHINEAS D. CLAYTON, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: May 5, 1933

Citations

131 Cal.App. 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
21 P.2d 1017