From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clayton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 20, 2003
105 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81545

May 20, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Robert S. Cohen.

Gwenda R. Robinson, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J.


[THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]


ORDER


Movant, Mark L. Clayton, appeals from the judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant contends his counsel was ineffective for assuring him that he would receive only three years for first degree robbery and armed criminal action and this false assurance rendered his guilty plea involuntary.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Clayton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 20, 2003
105 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Clayton v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK L. CLAYTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 20, 2003

Citations

105 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)