Clay v. State

Full title: Byron R. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 22, 2004

889 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 4D04-3784.

December 22, 2004.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ana I. Gardiner, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 99-23168 CF10A 00-2503 CF10A.

Byron R. Clay, Miami, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing in the trial court a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion that identifies specific non-hearsay, record evidence that supports his claim. Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla. 2002); Wachter v. State, 868 So.2d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Appellant may raise the alleged violation of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), in a rule 3.850 motion if he can establish a valid exception to the two-year time limitation. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(b).

FARMER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.