From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clay v. Papik

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 13, 2015
CV 14-6599 PSG (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2015)

Opinion

          Attorneys for Plaintiff: Not Present.

          Attorneys for Defendant: Not Present.


          PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER

          Michael R. Wilner, J.

         1. After reviewing the City Attorney's recent submission (Docket# 34), the Court understands that Plaintiff appeared for her deposition and gave substantive testimony. In light of this, the Court GRANTS the City's pending motion to modify the pending case deadlines. (Docket# 29.) The motion to dismiss the action is DENIED without prejudice.

         2. The Court sets the following revised deadlines for this action:

Event

Date

Fact Discovery to be Completed

October 26, 2015

Expert Disclosure Produced

November 16, 2015

Expert Discovery Concluded

January 18, 2016

ADR Completed

January 18, 2016

Last Day for Summary Judgment Motions

February 24, 2016

to Be Heard


Summaries of

Clay v. Papik

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 13, 2015
CV 14-6599 PSG (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Clay v. Papik

Case Details

Full title:Clay v. Papik

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jul 13, 2015

Citations

CV 14-6599 PSG (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2015)