From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clary v. Hastings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
May 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-44 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-44 (HL)

05-17-2012

JOSH ALLEN CLARY, Plaintiff, v. JOE HASTINGS, LT. LARRY BYRD, and CAPTAIN JULIUS COX, Defendants.


ORDER

This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff (Doc. 10), entered on April 25, 2012. Judge Langstaff recommends that Defendants Byrd and Cox be dismissed from the case, and that the case proceed against Defendant Hastings. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation for clear error, and finds no error. The Recommendation is accepted and adopted. Defendants Byrd and Cox are dismissed as party-defendants. The case will move forward against Defendant Hastings.

___________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE
mbh


Summaries of

Clary v. Hastings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
May 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-44 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Clary v. Hastings

Case Details

Full title:JOSH ALLEN CLARY, Plaintiff, v. JOE HASTINGS, LT. LARRY BYRD, and CAPTAIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: May 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-44 (HL) (M.D. Ga. May. 17, 2012)