From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 25, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 342 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)

Opinion

October 25, 1957

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Queens County, JENKIN R. HOCKERT, J.

John J. O'Connor and James M. Gilleran for appellant.

Louis Wallach and Harry Hartman for respondent.


Unsworn testimony is not admissible in civil actions ( Stoppick v. Goldstein, 174 App. Div. 306; Napiearlski v. Pickering, 278 App. Div. 456). Where it appears probable that the unsworn testimony of an infant was given weight in the determination below, the interests of justice require that such determination be set aside and a new trial ordered.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law, with costs to the defendant to abide the event, and a new trial ordered.

PETTE, HART and DI GIOVANNA, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Clarke v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 25, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 342 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
Case details for

Clarke v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA CLARKE, an Infant, by CHARLES G. CLARKE, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1957

Citations

9 Misc. 2d 342 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
172 N.Y.S.2d 761

Citing Cases

SCHUCK v. RAO ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT CO., INC

Not having been sworn because of tender age, his testimony was not admissible and constituted reversible…

Fineman v. Krebs

Term, 1st Dept.]; Cutler v. Flom [No. 854 Sept.-Oct. 1936, App. Term, 2d Dept.]; Inkelis v. Lehman, 2 Misc.2d…