From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. Clarke

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Apr 18, 1975
326 N.E.2d 722 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)

Opinion

April 18, 1975.

John J. Ford for Janet Clarke.

Andre R. Sigourney for Frederick Clarke.


The wife appeals from decrees of a Probate Court dismissing her petition for separate support and giving custody of their minor children to her husband on a petition for custody brought by him. The case comes here with the judge's report of material facts and designated portions of the transcript of the evidence. Rule 1:02 of the Appeals Court, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 883 (1972). The decision was based on oral testimony and the judge, who saw and heard the witnesses, was in a better position to determine their credibility than we are from a printed record. His judgment must stand unless found to be plainly wrong. Barnum v. Fay, 320 Mass. 177, 180 (1946). Manoogian v. Manoogian, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 825 (1973). From our review of the evidence and of the facts found by the judge, we conclude that he was not plainly wrong and that his decrees must be affirmed.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Clarke v. Clarke

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Apr 18, 1975
326 N.E.2d 722 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)
Case details for

Clarke v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK CLARKE vs. JANET CLARKE

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Apr 18, 1975

Citations

326 N.E.2d 722 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)
326 N.E.2d 722

Citing Cases

Angelone v. Angelone

Prindle v. Fisk, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 843, 844 (1974). Clarke v. Clarke, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 736, 737 (1975). Daigle…

Rolde v. Rolde

On this record we cannot say that the judge was clearly wrong in awarding sole custody to the wife. See Smith…