From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Yodlee, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 28, 2023
20-cv-05991-SK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-05991-SK

11-28-2023

DARIUS CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. YODLEE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING DOCKET NOS. 384, 385

SALLIE KIM United States Magistrate Judge.

Now before the Court is the parties' dispute over Yodlee's responses to some of Plaintiffs' requests for production of documents. (Dkt. No. 384.) The parties also dispute whether Yodlee may file a declaration in support of its position. (Dkt. No. 385.)

The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's motion to compel further production of documents and GRANTS Yodlee's request to file a declaration in support of its position.

Plaintiffs seek documents responsive to several requests for production of documents (5, 91, 11, 13, 44, 46, 48, 49, 55, and 59 from Set Two and 3 from Set Three) that pertain to Yodlee's sale of IAV data. Yodlee argues that it cannot produce something that does not exist. The requests at issue are premised on the fact that Yodlee sells the IAV data at issue, and, thus, because Yodlee claims that it did not do so, it cannot produce these documents. In essence, Yodlee's argument is akin to the objection that the question assumes a fact not in evidence, since producing responsive documents is only possible if Yodlee sells the IAV data at issue. Thus, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' request.

Plaintiffs also seek documents regarding the prices at which it sells “Bank Transaction Data.” Although Plaintiffs do not identify a specific document request, it appears that these documents are responsive to Document Request No. 55, which seeks “[d]ocuments sufficient to identify all products You sell to Your customers including a product description, selling price per unit, cost per unit, any discounts, and the basis for such discounts.” Yodlee argues that this category of documents is not relevant, but Plaintiffs argue that they need this information to construct a theory of damages. Thus, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to compel Yodlee to produce documents showing the prices at which it sells “Bank Transaction Data.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Clark v. Yodlee, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 28, 2023
20-cv-05991-SK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Clark v. Yodlee, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DARIUS CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. YODLEE, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 28, 2023

Citations

20-cv-05991-SK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)