From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 2002
831 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

certifying conflict with Smith

Summary of this case from Bates v. State

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-2760.

Opinion filed December 18, 2002.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Dennis J. Murphy, Judge. L.T. No. 95-9539.

Isaac Clark, in proper person.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Erin K. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE, and SHEVIN, JJ.


Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm on the authority of Scott v. State, 813 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that defendant not entitled to relief "where he has been given affirmative misadvice regarding the possible sentencing-enhancing consequences of a plea in the event that the defendant commits a new crime in the future"). See also McPhee v. State, 823 So.2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Wallace v. State, No. 3D01-3339 (Fla. 3d DCA August 14, 2002).

As we did in Wallace and McPhee, we certify conflict withSmith v. State, 784 So.2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 2002
831 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

certifying conflict with Smith

Summary of this case from Bates v. State
Case details for

Clark v. State

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC CLARK, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 18, 2002

Citations

831 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Bates v. State

For example, several cases are pending in this Court raising the same issue, either because the district…