From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 9, 2017
219 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D16–3817

06-09-2017

Chance M. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Chance M. Clark, Live Oak, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Chance M. Clark, Live Oak, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Appellant's rule 3.800(a)/3.801 motion without prejudice to Appellant seeking relief pursuant to a timely filed rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., and PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 9, 2017
219 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Clark v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHANCE M. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 9, 2017

Citations

219 So. 3d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)