From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Spencer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Mar 25, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-12989-FDS (D. Mass. Mar. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-12989-FDS

03-25-2014

RICHARD CLARK, Plaintiff, v. LUIS SPENCER, Commissioner, ALLISON HALLETT, Superintendent, and CORNELIA DeLEON, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAYLOR, J.

On March 10, 2014, this Court issued a Memorandum and Order directing plaintiff Richard Clark to show cause, within 45 days, why his complaint against Luis Spencer, Allison Hallett, and Cornelia DeLeon should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On March 20, 2014, plaintiff filed a response to the order and an amended complaint. Plaintiff's response fails to add sufficient facts to state a claim for relief. Furthermore, plaintiff did not obtain leave to file an amended complaint, and the facts stated therein are only tangentially related to the original complaint and insufficient in any event to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED.

So Ordered.

________

F. Dennis Saylor IV

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Clark v. Spencer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Mar 25, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-12989-FDS (D. Mass. Mar. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Clark v. Spencer

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CLARK, Plaintiff, v. LUIS SPENCER, Commissioner, ALLISON HALLETT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-12989-FDS (D. Mass. Mar. 25, 2014)