From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Nevans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS.

December 4, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On May 5, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 5, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Hershewe's motion for attorneys' fees and cost under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is granted in the amount of $35,840 and costs are allowed in the amount of $343.12.


Summaries of

Clark v. Nevans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Clark v. Nevans

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA CLARK, Plaintiff, v. CARRIE NEVANS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 4, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lenk v. Monolithic Power Sys., Inc.

Other courts have awarded attorneys' fees and costs under the Christiansburg standard when pro se plaintiffs…