Opinion
Decided September 20, 2001.
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal with respect to respondent Currie, dismissed upon the ground that appellants have failed to demonstrate the timeliness of the motion with respect to respondent Currie as required by section 500.11(d)(1)(iii) of this Court's Rules of Practice; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. 80 N.Y.2d 388, 392, n. 1).