From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Brown

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 10, 2003
Case No. C 02 2609 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. C 02 2609 WHA

March 10, 2003

DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney, JOANNE HOEPER, Chief Trial Attorney, DAVID B. NEWDORF, ADINE K. VARAH, Deputy City Attorneys, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants WILLIE BROWN, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT and SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION.

ZENIA K. GILG, ESQ., DANNY B. SCHULTZ, ESQ., Attorneys for Plaintiff Joseph Clark.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)]


The undersigned parties, being all the parties who have appeared in this action, STIPULATE through counsel pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a) that the action on behalf of Plaintiff Joseph Clark against all Defendants is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further STIPULATED that Plaintiff Joseph Clark and Defendants shall each pay his (or its) own costs and attorney's fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:


Summaries of

Clark v. Brown

United States District Court, N.D. California
Mar 10, 2003
Case No. C 02 2609 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2003)
Case details for

Clark v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH CLARK, Plaintiff, v. WILLIE BROWN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 10, 2003

Citations

Case No. C 02 2609 WHA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2003)