From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 15, 2013
3:12-cv-00069-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-cv-00069-HDM-VPC

04-15-2013

EARLENE CLARK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court has considered the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#20) filed on March 14, 2013, in which the magistrate judge recommends that this court enter an order denying plaintiff's motion for reversal and/or remand (#17) and grant the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment (#19). No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed and the time for filing any objections has expired. The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and hereby ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#20).

Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for reversal and/or remand (#17) is DENIED, and the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment (#19) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Clark v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 15, 2013
3:12-cv-00069-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Clark v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:EARLENE CLARK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

3:12-cv-00069-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Apr. 15, 2013)