From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarendon House v. Helfert

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jun 12, 1972
189 S.E.2d 331 (Va. 1972)

Opinion

42727 Record No. 7816.

June 12, 1972

Present, I'Anson, Carrico, Harrison, Cochran and Harman, JJ.

Appellate Review — Points Not Raised Below.

Errors assigned either were not preserved by objections in trial court or raise questions for the first time on appeal.

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Arlington County. Hon. Walter T. McCarthy, judge presiding.

Affirmed.

Henry F. Lerch [D.C.]; Alfred W. Trueax (Harry W. Lerch [D.C.]; William C. Nemeth, on brief), for plaintiff in error.

Alexander Long Wilson (Wilson Holland, on brief), for defendants in error.


Plaintiffs, Robert C. Helfert and Jean I. Helfert, husband and wife, instituted this action against the defendants, Clarendon House, Inc., Michael M. Abrams, and Mrs. P. N. Pavlos, to recover for trespass upon their leasehold interest in an apartment and damage to certain personal property therein. The jury awarded plaintiffs compensatory and punitive damages against Clarendon House and found for the other defendants. On a cross-claim filed by Clarendon House the jury found for the plaintiffs. Judgment was entered on the jury's verdict, and Clarendon House is here on a writ of error.

Clarendon House has assigned numerous errors, but after a careful examination of the record we find that it either failed to preserve its objections in the trial court or raised questions for the first time on this appeal.

Even if we assume, without deciding, that some of the errors assigned are meritorious, Clarendon House cannot now rely upon them. Rules of Court 1:8; Boyce v. Maryland Casualty Co., Etc., 212 Va. 767, 188 S.E.2d 75 (1972).

Now Rule 5:7, effective March 1, 1972.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Clarendon House v. Helfert

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jun 12, 1972
189 S.E.2d 331 (Va. 1972)
Case details for

Clarendon House v. Helfert

Case Details

Full title:CLARENDON HOUSE, INC. v. ROBERT C. HELFERT, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Jun 12, 1972

Citations

189 S.E.2d 331 (Va. 1972)
189 S.E.2d 331

Citing Cases

Newlon v. City of Alexandria

We find the plan to be both relevant and material. Now, on an inadequate record, they would have us entertain…

Buck v. Jordan

" Chawla v. BurgerBusters, Inc., 255 Va. 616, 622, 499 S.E.2d 829, 832 (1998) (citing Wright v. Norfolk…