From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clairol Incorporated v. Carlton Drug, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1967
27 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

January 24, 1967


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff. The issues of law and fact are substantially the same as in Clairol Inc. v. Peekskill Thrift Drug Corp. ( 25 A.D.2d 496) decided subsequent to the entry of the judgment herein. We there held the retail sale of uncartoned bottles of plaintiff's product with instructional material unlike the instructions enclosed in plaintiff's individually cartoned bottles for retail sale to be in violation of section 368-d Gen. Bus. of the General Business Law. Settle findings, conclusions and judgment in conformity herewith.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Stevens, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Clairol Incorporated v. Carlton Drug, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1967
27 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Clairol Incorporated v. Carlton Drug, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CLAIROL INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. CARLTON DRUG, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran

Compare, e.g. El Greco Leather Products Co. v. Shoe World, Inc. (2d Cir. 1986) 806 F.2d 392, cert. denied,…

Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran

Other courts faced with similar facts have reached the same result. See Clairol, Inc. v. Carlton Drug, Inc.,…