From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claiborne v. Blauser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-2427 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-2427 LKK EFB P

03-29-2013

DENNIS CLAIBORNE, Plaintiff, v. BLAUSER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 30, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from the date the findings and recommendations were served. After extensions of time, plaintiff has timely filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 30, 2012, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's May 21, 2012 motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 55) is denied.

So ordered.

________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Claiborne v. Blauser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-2427 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Claiborne v. Blauser

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS CLAIBORNE, Plaintiff, v. BLAUSER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-2427 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)