From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claeys v. Gandalf, Ltd.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio
Jan 30, 2004
Case No. 2:02-cv-313 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2:02-cv-313

January 30, 2004


ORDER


Defendants' unopposed December 22, 2003 motion to compel plaintiffs to answer and respond to their discovery is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Scott Rowland and Justin L. Pritchard are ORDERED to respond to defendants' first set of interrogatories and first request for production of documents with fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order.

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. and Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F. 5 either party may, within ten (10) days after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for reconsideration by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection thereto. The District Judge, upon consideration of the motion, shall set aside any part of this Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.


Summaries of

Claeys v. Gandalf, Ltd.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio
Jan 30, 2004
Case No. 2:02-cv-313 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2004)
Case details for

Claeys v. Gandalf, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:Ed Claeys, et al., Plaintiffs v. Gandalf, Ltd., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio

Date published: Jan 30, 2004

Citations

Case No. 2:02-cv-313 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2004)