noting that nonconforming uses are disfavored and should be terminated as quickly as possible "because those uses frustrate a local government's implementation of consistent and logical land use planning"
Summary of this case from Griswold v. City of HomerNo. S-9574.
February 1, 2002.
Petition for Rehearing Granted in part and Denied in part. Opinion No. 5528 is Withdrawn and Replaced by Opinion No. 5584, June 14, 2002.
noting that nonconforming uses are disfavored and should be terminated as quickly as possible "because those uses frustrate a local government's implementation of consistent and logical land use planning"
Summary of this case from Griswold v. City of HomerFull title:Jennifer CIZEK and Joseph Cizek, Appellants v. CONCERNED CITIZENS OF EAGLE…
Court:Supreme Court of Alaska
Date published: Feb 1, 2002
FACTSAND PROCEEDINGS The underlying facts in this opinion are taken from our opinion in the substantive…
Whah v. WhahFinally, we note that a finding that a waiver was limited — i.e., that it was revocable and did not preclude…